A Cheaper, Faster And Greener Solar Panel Manufacturing Process

The cleaning performance of three different fluorine-containing precursors - sulphur hexafluride (SF6), nitrogen trifluride (NF3) and molecular fluorine (F2) - is compared from theoretical, experimental and commercial points of view. Experiments were performed using an Oerlikon Solar KAI Gen 5 (1300mm x 1100mm) R&D platform. For the experiments with F2, an "on-site/on-demand" generator from The Linde Group, was installed at the Oerlikon Solar facility in Trubbach, Switzerland. The SF6-based cleaning process was found to be up to 75% less efficient than the corresponding NF3 or F2 process. A comparison between NF3 and F2 indicates that a significantly larger process window is available for reactor cleaning when F2 is used in place of NF3. This leads to both time and gas mass savings, improving productivity and bringing down the cost of ownership of the reactor cleaning process. As a direct consequence, Oerlikon Solar has decided to transfer the process to their production KAI MT plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) platforms.

Author
G F Leu, Et Al
Origin
Oerlikon Solar, Switzerland
Journal Title
Photovoltaics Internatiational 17 2012 14-16, 18, 20, 22, 24
Sector
Flat glass
Class
F 3347

Request article (free for British Glass members)

A Cheaper, Faster And Greener Solar Panel Manufacturing Process
Photovoltaics Internatiational 17 2012 14-16, 18, 20, 22, 24
F 3347
Are you a member?
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.